Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Annals of Oncology ; 32:S884, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1432849

ABSTRACT

Background: Cemiplimab is a programmed cell death receptor-1 inhibitor with antitumour activity for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and acceptable safety proved in its pivotal trial. We provide the first data on cemiplimab safety in daily practice from the named patient programme (NPP) for advanced CSCC in Spain. Methods: This cemiplimab NPP was performed from March 2019 to March 2020. It included patients aged ≥18 years with advanced CSCC and ineligible for surgery, radiation therapy or clinical trials. The cemiplimab safety was assessed according to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported until March 2021. Results: 140 patients were included (median age [interquartile range, IQR] 77.0 [65.0-84.0] years;age ≥80 38%;men 71.7%;≥1 comorbidity 83%;ECOG 0-1 86.3%;locally advanced CSCC 60.7%;cemiplimab as first-line therapy 67.7%). Cemiplimab was received for a median (IQR) of 8.0 (3.0-14.0) cycles. Fifty-eight (41.4%) patients showed ≥1 of the 163 TEAEs reported, which most frequently included diarrhoea n=7, asthenia n=6, constipation n=4 and abdominal pain n=4. Fourteen (8.6%) were immune-mediated, mainly bronchitis n=2, pneumonitis n=2 and hepatitis n=2. Seventy-eight (47.9%) TEAEs were grade ≥3, most frequently pneumonia n=3, COVID-19 n=3, general physical health deterioration n=2, pyrexia n=2, renal transplant failure n=2, sepsis n=2, acute kidney injury n=2 and respiratory failure n=2. Twenty-one (12.9%) were treatment-related (TREAEs): 11 (6.7%) were grade 1-2 (diarrhoea n=3 and asthenia, hepatotoxicity, malnutrition, odynophagia, polymyalgia rheumatica, pneumonitis, pruritus, and skin toxicity), 9 (5.5%) grade 3 (acute kidney injury, adrenal insufficiency, abdominal pain, blood creatinine increased, dysphagia, haematuria, immune-mediated enterocolitis, panniculitis, surgical wound infection) and 1 (0.6%) unknown grade. Cemiplimab was withdrawn due to TREAEs in only 5 (3.6%) patients. The TEAE outcome was fatal in 29 (17.8%);none related to cemiplimab. Conclusions: This NPP supports the real-life safety of cemiplimab for CSCC, showing an acceptable safety profile consistent with previous reports. Editorial acknowledgement: Editorial assistance was provided by Esther Álvarez-García at Dynamic Science S.L., funded by Sanofi. Legal entity responsible for the study: Sanofi. Funding: Sanofi. Disclosure: E. Muñoz Couselo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: GlaxoSmithKline;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Sanofi. A. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi Aventis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Serono;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Perso al, Invited Speaker: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi Aventis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Serono;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Sanofi Aventis;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Merck Serono;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Merck Sharp & Dohme;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre. O. Sanmartin: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Officer: Sanofi Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Sanofi Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Officer: Roche Pharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Roche Pharma. J. Cañueto: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Hoffman-La Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi-Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AbbVie;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: LeoPharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy: Sanofi-Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy: InflaRx;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy: Almirall. S. Beá Ardébol: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Meda;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: SunPharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Trial subinvestigator: Sanofi Aventis;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Trial subinvestigator: SunPharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Trial subinvestigator: PellePharma. R. Fernández-de-Misa Cabrera: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi. A.J. Cunquero-Tomás: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre;Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagements: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, 2021 EADO/WMC Congress inscription fee: Sanofi. L. Fernández Franco: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier. I. Romero: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pharmamar;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: GSK;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Clovis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pharmamar;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: GSK;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Clovis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. J. Medina Martínez: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Novartis;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Ad isory Board: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: MSD;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merk;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Merk;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2.
Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas ; 111(8):629-638, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1235818

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Spain is in a situation of indefinite lockdown due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. One of the consequences of this lockdown is delays in medical and surgical procedures for common diseases. The aim of this study was to model the impact on survival of tumor growth caused by such delays in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. Material and methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. We constructed an exponential growth model for both SCC and melanoma to estimate tumor growth between patient-reported onset and surgical excision at different time points. Results: Data from 200 patients with SCC of the head and neck and 1000 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included. An exponential growth curve was calculated for each tumor type and we estimated tumor size after 1, 2, and 3 months of potential surgical delay. The proportion of patients with T3 SCC (diameter > 4cm or thickness > 6mm) increased from 41.5% (83 patients) in the initial study group to an estimated 58.5%, 70.5%, and 72% after 1, 2, and 3 months of delay. Disease-specific survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients whose surgery was delayed by 3 months decreased by 6.2%, 8.2%, and 5.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients with ultrathick melanoma (> 6mm) increased from 6.9% in the initial study group to 21.9%, 30.2%, and 30.2% at 1, 2, and 3 months. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival both decreased by 14.4% in patients treated after a potential delay of 3 months. Conclusions: In the absence of adequate diagnosis and treatment of SCC and melanoma in the current lockdown situation in Spain, we can expect to see to a considerable increase in large and thick SCCs and melanomas. Efforts must be taken to encourage self-examination and facilitate access to dermatologists in order to prevent further delays.

3.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 111(8): 629-638, 2020 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-592551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spain is in a situation of indefinite lockdown due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. One of the consequences of this lockdown is delays in medical and surgical procedures for common diseases. The aim of this study was to model the impact on survival of tumor growth caused by such delays in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. We constructed an exponential growth model for both SCC and melanoma to estimate tumor growth between patient-reported onset and surgical excision at different time points. RESULTS: Data from 200 patients with SCC of the head and neck and 1000 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included. An exponential growth curve was calculated for each tumor type and we estimated tumor size after 1, 2, and 3 months of potential surgical delay. The proportion of patients with T3 SCC (diameter >4cm or thickness >6 mm) increased from 41.5% (83 patients) in the initial study group to an estimated 58.5%, 70.5%, and 72% after 1, 2, and 3 months of delay. Disease-specific survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients whose surgery was delayed by 3 months decreased by 6.2%, 8.2%, and 5.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients with ultrathick melanoma (>6 mm) increased from 6.9% in the initial study group to 21.9%, 30.2%, and 30.2% at 1, 2, and 3 months. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival both decreased by 14.4% in patients treated after a potential delay of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of adequate diagnosis and treatment of SCC and melanoma in the current lockdown situation in Spain, we can expect to see to a considerable increase in large and thick SCCs and melanomas. Efforts must be taken to encourage self-examination and facilitate access to dermatologists in order to prevent further delays.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Melanoma/pathology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Burden , Age Factors , Algorithms , COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Delayed Diagnosis/adverse effects , Delayed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Pandemics , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Quarantine , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL